Sunday, June 26, 2011

Religious experience


Religious experience means a very specific unite extra ordinary surprise experience that made wander awe and mystery in the presents of divinity all sacred. This topic most not discuss before the word of “Verities of religious experience” (written by William James). Religious experience must be understood against the background of ordinary experience. Experience is the knowledge perceived by senses.  
According to empiricism, all ideas believe and theory comes from sensual idol. On the other hand, religious experience gods beyond the sensual idol. The awareness of the holy which means awe and reverences the feelings of dependent the sense of with the divide the perception of an unseen order can be taken as religious experience. According to Hebrew Bible reveals the experience of God on critical Jubgman on humanity and the separation from the holy.
Religious experience in involves what is final in value for human beings and concern believe and what is ultimate and reality. For example, Jesus try personal religious experience of seen God is the culmination of religious life. All religious experience can be destroy intends of three basic Enlightenment.
1.      The personal concern.
2.      The personal attitude.
3.      The social form.
Although, the first two Enlightenment can be destitute there are no spirited religious experience is always found on connection with personal concern oriental to work the power of the self. Historical religious traditions find their rule in the religious experience and inside who have served as founder religious experience is always understood as a subjective experience.
Sub Topic (the experience of God.)
The term religious experience is used for any experience. One has in connection with one’s religious life including senses of guilt or release, joys, fears, a sense of gratitude and so on. Firstly, the awareness of God is experienced, is contrasted with abstract thought. Secondly, the experience is direct the subject feel immediately Awareness of God. Rather then, beings awareness of God through being awareness of something else.  Thirdly, the experience is completely lacking in sense content. It is a non-sense   presentation of God. Finally, it is a focal experience one in which the awareness of attracts somebody attention sours strongly.
Sub Topic (Mystical experience.)
Philosopher are interested in mystical experience serves as sours song knowledge though who had such as experienced difficultly take themselves to have learn something from there. Usually, they supported only limited sense of belief to be justified there include the belief that God exits certain believe about his nature and believes about what God is doing. The fast that the subjects take themselves to acquire knowledge of God from mystical perception does not guarantee that they do. One can be mislead even by sense experience, in extreme cause one can be subject complete hallucinations. As for mystical experience, we need look no further them many causes in which someone support that good commanded the murder of as many people in contrast to those instances in which one is awareness of God as supremely loving. In both area of experience, there are two ways in which one can acquire for believe. The two cause of sense elation just mention illustrate this as do the kinds of people supposing themselves to be awareness of God telling them to do things that God would not tell anyone to do. The main issue will be whether mystical experiences are genuine. Since skeptics about religious experience usually taken that one is ever genuinely awareness of really existence God.
            Reason for a positive answer can be deviated into theological and philosophical one the former conformist any comforter of the belief system of a given religion that give us reason for thinking. As for philosophical reason, one can used the mystical experience as approve for the existence of God. According to this position believes formed on the base of experience posses and initial credibility by virtue of their origin.   
            A lush number of temporary philosophers deny that anyone ever genuinely perceives the present of God. Most of the reason base on different between sense experience and mystical experience. The first and most obvious reasons for a negative easement concern certain striking different between sense experience and mystical experience. Sense experience is a comment position of all human beings whereas mystical experience is not.  
            A second comment charade is that the mystics is simply reading prior religious believes into a cognitively in different experience. Rather than being directly awareness of supreme reality. A third reason, for partiality is the supposition that mystical experience can be explained in naturalistic terms and that this fact shows it not to constitute in experience of a super natural reality. A four important different between sense and mystical perception is that there are effective tests for accuracy in the cause of the former but not the latter.
It is important to be clear as tow words is and is not in word and this problem it would not be sensible to think that mystical perceptions can general a complete system of religious belief. Hence, the experience and report of Christian and Muslim might not contradict each other. Even thought, there are contradictions between the two complete bodies of belief.

No comments:

Post a Comment